A.P.RAVANI
PATEL GORDHAN KADVABHAI – Appellant
Versus
COMPETENT AUTHORITY and ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR,rajkot – Respondent
( 1 ) NOT the integrated whole of the person but different disintegrated component parts of the person be recognised as separate entity and he served with a show-cause notice and be afforded an opportunity of being heard. Such is the plea raised by the petitioners who are different component parts of an association of individuals a person. Can such a plea be upheld ?
( 2 ) THE petitioners along with respondent No. 3 purchased a piece of vacant land situated within the Urban agglomeration area of Rajkot. The land admeasured about 13861 sq. m. It appears that the land was purchased some time in the year 1966 by a registered sale deed executed in favour of petitioners and respondent No. 3. After the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act 1976 came into force respondent No. 3 filled in form under the provisions of Sec. 6 (1) of the Act. In the form it was declared that the form was filled in on behalf of himself and on behalf of the petitioners. In the facts and circumstances of the case it was treated by the Competent Authority that the form was filled in by an association of individuals and respondent No. 3 throughout the proceedings represented the association of ind
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.