SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Guj) 133

R.A.MEHTA
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
BHAGWANJI PITAMBER – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.K.Shah, K.T.DAVE

R. A. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application against the order granting bail. It is treated as an application for cancellation of bail and not as revision application.

( 2 ) THE learned Addl. P. P. has submitted that the offence charged against the accused is punishable under Sec. 302 of IPC read with Secs. 147 148 149 307 324 323 of IPC. There are in all 29 accused and all of them have been granted bail by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge Morvi by an order dated 27-8-1987. The State has preferred this application against the present three accused persons and submitted that these three persons have taken direct and active part in the incident resulting into the death of Lalubha. The learned Addl. P. P. has also submitted that there is great tension in the village and when all the accused were released on bail the State had to put Special Police Force in village. He has submitted that at present that Police Force is withdrawn.

( 3 ) THE learned Counsel for the respondent-accused has submitted that ordinarily bail is to be granted and only in special circumstances bail can be refused and in the present case there are circumstances for granting bail and the learned Sessions Judge on co








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top