SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Guj) 151

R.A.MEHTA
MANGALSINGH BHANSINGH RATHOD – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: M.R.GEHANI, S.V.RAJU

R. A. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a bail application in respect of an offence under The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 985 grams of brown sugar valued at Rs. 59 100 is the subject matter the offence. On 23-9-1957 the Preventive Officer of Central Excise Headquarters Office Ahmedabad bad received an information to the effect that accused No. 1-Bharatji was to deliver brown sugar to accused No. 2-Bansi G. Chauhan at about 1-00 oclock. As a result of this information there were watch search and seizure and it quantity of 985 grams of foreign brown sugar valued at Rs. 59 100 was seized under a panchnama.

( 2 ) THE accused No. 3 the present petitioner was not present and was not shown to be involved in the offence. However it appears from the statements of accused Nos. 1 and 2 that this narcotic drug i. e. brown sugar was supplied by the present petitioner-accused No. 3 about a week before its seizure and was given for disposal and preservation. The statements of the co-accused were recorded by the authorised officer of Excise Department under See. 67 of the Act. Accused No. 2 has stated that this muddamal was supplied by the petitioner about seven days before its seizur
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top