( 1 ) IT is saddening to start with the introduction of parties and the back drop of circumstances in which this Revision Application has come up for final hearing before me.

( 2 ) THE petitioner Vaidya Harishankar Laxmiram Rajyaguru is the father of respondent Pratapray Harishankar Rajyaguru Respondent is the son of the petitioner. Both of them are established Vaidyas in Rajkot. It is a well-to-do family. Both of them and particularly the petitioner are advanced in age. They have been fighting between themselves since more than a decade. I was therefore very eager to see that the matter was amicably settled between them I called both of them before me and intervened in every small item of their dispute to see that once again they may have a real relationship of father and son between them. At one stage I was hopeful that my sincere attempts may succeed but in the end my attempts failed as both of them could not see eye to eye with each other both literally and figuratively. They broke the negotiations for compromise before me on an issue relating to their residential house. I still waited in the hope that they may go back to Rajkot ponder over their disputes to con