Gujarat High Court
Judgename :M.B.SHAH
ARAB AHMEDBIN ABDULLA - Appellant
Versus
ARAB BAIL MOHMUNA SAIYADBHAI - Respondent
S.CRI.A. 586 of 1987
Decided On : 02/18/1988
Once the order under Sec. 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code granting maintenance to the divorced woman is passed, then her rights are crystalized and she gets vested right to recover maintenance from her former husband. That vested right is not taken away by the Parliament by providing any provision in the Muslim Women Act.
( 1 ) IN these petitions the questions which arise for determination are: (1)Whether by the enactment of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986 hereinafter referred to as the Muslim Women Act the orders passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class under Sec. 125 of the Criminal Procecode ordering the husband to pay maintenance to the wife are nullified ? (2) Whether the Muslim Women Act takes away the rights which are conferred upon the divorced women under the Personal Law as interpreted by the Supreme Court in the case of Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum AIR 1985 SC 945 ? (3) Whether the Muslim Women Act provides that a divorced woman is entitled to have the maintenance only during the that period i. e. only for the that period ?as these questions are of importance a number of learned Advocates intervened in the matter and they ably rendered assistance.
( 2 ) FOR deciding the aforesaid questions it would be necessary to refer to the preamble of the Act which reads as under: An Act to protect the rights of Muslim women who have been divorced by or have obtained divorce from their husbands and to provide for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. From this problems one thing is apparent that the act is enacted to protect the rights of Muslim women who have been divorced by or have obtained divorce from their husbands. This is as clear as anything could be. In simplest language the Parliament has stated that the Act is for protecting the rights of Muslim Women. It does not provide that it is enacted for taking away some rights which a Muslim woman was having either under the Personal Law or under the general law i. e. Secs. 125 to 128 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The aforesaid preamble further provides that it is also enacted for making other provisions for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.
( 3 ) KEEPING this in mind we have to consider the provisions of Sec. 3. As this section requires to be interpreted. it would be necessary to refer to it in its entirety. Section 3 is as under:"3 (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force a divorced woman shall be entitled to (a)A reasonable and fair provision and maintenance to be made and paid to her within the that period by her former husband; (b) Where she herself maintains the children born to her before or after her divorce a reasonable and fair provision and maintenance to be made and Paid by her former husband for a period of two years from the respective dates of birth of such children; (c) An amount equal to the sum of mahr or dower agreed to be paid to her at the time of her marriage or at any time thereafter according to Muslim Law; and (d) All the properties given to her before or at the time of marriage or after her marriage by her relatives or friends or the husband or any relatives of the husband or his friend. (2) Where a reasonable and fair provision and maintenance or the amount of mahr or dower due has not been made or paid or the properties referred to in clause (d) of sub-sec. (1) have not been delivered to a divorced woman on her divorce she or any one duly authorised by her may on her behalf make an application to a Magistrate for an order for payment of such provision and maintenance mahr or dower or the delivery of properties as the case may be. (3) Where an application has been made under sub-sec. (2) by a divorced woman the Magistrate may if be is satisfied that (a) Her husband having sufficient means has failed or neglected to make or pay her within the that period a reasonable and fair provision and maintenance for her and the children; or (b) The amount equal to the sum of mahr or dower has not been paid or that the properties referred to in clauses (d) of sub-sec. (1) have not been delivered to her make an order within one month of the date of the filing of the application directing her former husband to pay such reasonable and fair provision and ma
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.