P.R.GOKULAKRISHNAN, R.J.SHAH
Ishabhai Umarbhai – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) RULE. Mr. Hawa and Mr. Karia waive service of the rule. With the consent of the parties, all these matters are taken up today.
( 2 ) IN all the above petitions, petitioners have come forward with Special Civil Applications, inter alia, praying for a direction to the competent authority to make a reference under S. 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. In all these cases, the prayer for making references under S. 18 was rejected on the ground that the same is barred by limitation.
( 3 ) AS regards the facts in these cases are concerned, there is no dispute that the petitioners were not present at the time the award was made by the Land Acquisition Officer; that the notice under S. 12 (2) was sent without the award annexed thereto; and that the petitioners were not award of the contents of the actual award.
( 4 ) IN view of these admitted facts, we can just refer to S. 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act reads as follows :-"18. Reference to Court :- (1) Any person interested who has not accepted the award may, by written application to the Collector, require that the matter be referred by the Collector for the determination of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.