SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Guj) 50

B.S.KAPADIA, S.B.MAJMUDAR
NASIMBANU MUNNAMIYA SHAIKH – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AHMEDABAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: H.L.PATEL, J.M.PANCHAL

MAJMUDAR J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner whose husband is detained purusuant to an order passed under Section 3 (1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act 1985 (PASA for short) by the Commissioner of Police Ahmedabad city has brought in challenge the said order of detention in this petition on diverse grounds.

( 2 ) THE impugned order is dated 29 It recites that the detaining authority is satisfied with respect to the detenu that the view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order in the area of Ahmedabad city it is necessary to make an order directing him to be detained. Along with the order of detention the detenu was also served with the order indicating that he may be detained in Sabarmati Central Prison. He was also served with grounds of detention supporting the detention order and alongwith the grounds of detention was supplied supporting material on which reliance was placed by the detaining authority for passing the impugned order of detention. The documents supplied along with the grounds of detention are also listed in the index indicating that 10 such documents were supplied and the bunch of documents comprising t





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top