( 1 ) ACCORDING to the prosecution the clothes of the appellant stained with blood and he had destroyed them by setting fire to them and the appellant was willing to show that place and also the place where he had left the portion of the rope which was tied to the bullock. According to the prosecution the appellant said that he had himself kept the piece of the rope at that particular spot and he took the Police and the Panchas in a vehicle. According to the prosecution the Investigating Officer and the Panchas wont to the Wadi of the appellant at village Khambhodar and they got down near that Wadi and went near the residential hut of the appellant and the appellant took them at the back of the said hut and took out the piece of rope from amongst the grass heap which was attached by the Investigating Officer in the presence of the Panchas. According to the prosecution that piece of rope was compared in the presence of the Panchas with the piece of rope which was found from over the dead body and it appeared that they were pieces of the same rope. This is what is disclosed in the Panchnama Ex 40. So far as the substantive evidence of the Panch Kala Karsan P. W. 15 Ex.