SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Guj) 105

N.B.PATEL, J.P.DESAI
Vikramsinh – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: G.D.Bhatt, J.P.GADHVI, V.P.THAKKAR

J. P. DESAI, J.

( 1 ) VIKRAMSINH Pravinsinh Rana is the petitioner in Special Criminal Application No. 282 of 1988 while Dilipsinh Pravinsinh Rana is the petitioner in Special Criminal Application No. 283 of 1988. They have been detained by two different orders passed by the District Magistrate, Rajkot under Sub-Section (1) of S. 3 of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (hereinafter to be referred to as the PASA Act), dated 8-2-1988 on ground that they are dangerous persons and their activities are prejudicial to the maintenance of the public order. These orders of detention as well as the continued detention of these two petitioners have been challenged by filing these two petitions raising several grounds of challenge. As one of the grounds of challenge, which is common in both petitions has appealed to us, these two petitions are heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgement.

( 2 ) AS we are inclined to allow these two petitions only on one ground which we shall discuss hereinafter, we do not propose to go into the other grounds of challenge raised in the memos of both these petitions.

( 3 ) THE petitioners have contended that they have




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top