SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Guj) 133

R.C.MANKAD
YASHKAMAL BUILDERS, BARODA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.J.PATEL, H.B.ANTANI

R. C. MANKAD, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER which is a partnership firm has filed this petition challenging the order Annexure H dated 12/01/1987 passed by the State Government cancelling permission for non-agricultural use of land granted by Taluka Development Officer Halol in respect of Survey Nos. 113/1 and 55 of village Penclav (hereinafter referred to as the land) Taluka Halol District Panchmahals. 2 One Mulchand Hirabhai Parikh who was the occupant of the land made an application for permission to Use the land for nonagricultural purposes to the Taluka Panchayat of Halol. The Taluka Development Officer of the Taluka Panchayat Halol granted such permission by his order Annexure A dated 17/12/1981 The petitioner purchased the land for consideration of Rs. 48 257 from Mulchand Hirabhai Parikh under a Registered sale deed dated 29/01/1982 The land was mutated to the name of the petitioner in the revenue records. On 4/03/1986 the State Government issued notice Annexure C calling upon the original occupant Mulchand Hirabhai Parikh to show cause why the permission for non-agricultural use of land should not be cancelled. It appears that the original occupant submitted reply to show cause notic












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top