Gujarat High Court
Judgename :R.C.MANKAD
YASHKAMAL BUILDERS, BARODA - Appellant
Versus
STATE - Respondent
S.C.A. 5834 of 1987
Decided On : 08/22/1988
Bombay Land Revenue Code – Section 65 – Gujarat Panchayats Act 1961 – Sections 157, 123 – Gujarat Land Revenue Rules 1972 – Amendment Rules 1977 – Non Agricultural Land Permission – Petitioner which is a partnership firm has filed this petition challenging the order Annexure H passed by the State Government cancelling permission for non-agricultural use of land granted by Taluka Development Officer Halol in respect of village Penclav – Held, In that case on similar facts this Court following the decision of the Supreme Court in State of Gujarat v. Raghav Natha held to the effect that revisional powers could not be exercised after expiry of reasonable period – In the instant case it could not be said that the State Government sought to exercise revisional powers within reasonable time – The State Government could not have cancelled the permission granted under Sec. 65 of the Code after a lapse of about four and half years – Therefore without entering into merits of the question whether or not grant of permission for non-agricultural use was proper or justified it must be held that the impugned order cancelling the permission granted under Sec. 65 of the Code cannot be sustained – The impugned order Annexure H is quashed and set aside and the order passed by Taluka Development Officer Halol granting permission for non-agricultural use of the land under Sec. 65 of the Code is restored – Petition Allowed
( 1 ) PETITIONER which is a partnership firm has filed this petition challenging the order Annexure H dated 12/01/1987 passed by the State Government cancelling permission for non-agricultural use of land granted by Taluka Development Officer Halol in respect of Survey Nos. 113/1 and 55 of village Penclav (hereinafter referred to as the land) Taluka Halol District Panchmahals. 2 One Mulchand Hirabhai Parikh who was the occupant of the land made an application for permission to Use the land for nonagricultural purposes to the Taluka Panchayat of Halol. The Taluka Development Officer of the Taluka Panchayat Halol granted such permission by his order Annexure A dated 17/12/1981 The petitioner purchased the land for consideration of Rs. 48 257 from Mulchand Hirabhai Parikh under a Registered sale deed dated 29/01/1982 The land was mutated to the name of the petitioner in the revenue records. On 4/03/1986 the State Government issued notice Annexure C calling upon the original occupant Mulchand Hirabhai Parikh to show cause why the permission for non-agricultural use of land should not be cancelled. It appears that the original occupant submitted reply to show cause notice contending to the effect that there was no reasonable ground to cancel the permission for non-agricultural use of the land. The State Government however by its impugned order Annexure H cancelled the permission for non-agricultural use of the land. Petitioner has therefore approached this Court by way of this petition.
( 2 ) IT is not in dispute that the original occupant Mulchand Hirabhai Parikh was holding the land which was agricultural in character and therefore it could not have been used for any purpose other than agriculture except with the permission of the Collector under Sec. 65 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code (Code for short ). That section insofar as it is relevant for our purposes reads as under:"65 Any occupant of land assessed or held for the purpose of agriculture is entitled by himself his servants tenant-agents or other legal representatives to erect farm building construct wells or tanks or make any other improvements thereon for the better cultivation of the land or its more convenient use for the purpose aforesaid. BUT if any occupant wishes to use his holding or any part thereof for any other purpose the Collectors permission shall in the first place be applied for by the occupant ". The Collector on receipt of such application. (A) shall send to the applicant a written acknowledgement of its receipt and (B) may after due inquiry either grant or refuse the permission applied for;provided that where the Collector fails to inform the applicant of his decision on the application within a period of three months the permission applied for shall be deemed to have been granted". It will be seen that under the aforesaid section power is conferred on the Collector to grant permission to the occupant of the land for making non-agricultural use of land which is agricultural in character.
( 3 ) SECTION 157 of the Gujarat Panchayats Act 1961 (Panchayats Act for short) insofar as it is relevant for our purposes reads as under:157 (s) Notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force the State Government may subject to such conditions as it may think fit to impose transfer by an order published in the Official Gazette to a District Panchayat any such powers functions and duties relating to any matter as are exercised or performed by the State Government or any Officer of Government under any enactment which the State Legislature is competent to enact or otherwise in the executive power of the State and appear to relate to matters arising within a District and to be of an administrative character and shall can such transfer; allot to the District Panchayat such fund and personnel as may be necessary to enable the District Panchayat to exercise the powers and discharge the functions and duties so transferred (2) Without
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.