SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Guj) 170

A.P.RAVANI, B.S.KAPADIA
RAJIBHAI T. CHOITANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: M.H.CHINOY, RAVI R.TRIPATHI

B. S. KAPADIA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner-detenu has filed the present petition against the impugned order of detention passed against him by the District Magistrate Bhavnagar on 2-6-1988 under the provisions of the Prevention of Blackmarketing and Maintenance of Supply of Essential Commodities Act 1980 The petitioner was served with the order as also ground of detention on the same day i. e. 2-6-1988.

( 2 ) ON persual of the grounds it appears that the present petitioner was managing the fair price shop in Bhavnagar locality of Bhavnagar City which was standing in the name of Jikarbhai Ahmedbhai Saiyed. On 5-5-1988 the Supply Inspector made a surprise visit to the said shop and inspected the same. During the inspection it was found that the opening stock of pamolene oil in the stock register was shown as six barrels i. e. 1140 kgs. while in the presence of Panchas when it was ascertained it was found that the stock was of 760 ks. i. e. only four barrels and therefore there was a deficit of 380 kgs. i. e. two barrels of pamolene. Before the Supply Inspector the petitioner had stated that he had taken the stock of six barrels from the godown of the Corporation but the remaining two barr



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top