SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Guj) 163

P.M.CHAUHAN, A.M.AHMADI
NATHALAL BAHECHARDAS PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.M.MANGUKIYA, M.I.HAVA

A. M. AHMADI, J.

( 1 ) RULE. Mr. Hawa waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondents. By consent heard today.

( 2 ) THE petitioner who was the proprietor of New Master Talkies Sidhpur (District Mehsana) has filed this petition challenging the demand notice issued by the Mamlatdar Sidhpur dated 5/05/1988 demanding an amount of Rs. 18 319 ps. with interest at 24 per cent per annum for difference in entertainment tax paid for the movies Sampoorna Tirthyatra exhibited between 30/03/1984 and 5/04/1984 and Antim Ichha exhibited between 25/01/1985 and 3 1/01/1985 on the plea that the population of Sidhpur township exceeded 50 0 and was not under 50 0 on the basis of which exemption to be extent of 80 per cent was granted in respect of the aforesaid two movies. Unfortunately no reply to this notice was sent on the grounds of sickness whereupon the Mamlatdar issued an attachment order dated 8/08/1988 which is also the subject matter of challenge in this petition. The brief facts giving rise to this petition are as under.

( 3 ) BY Notification No. SFC/1084/4391/f dated 21/04/1984 the Government of Gujarat 8 exemption from the payment of entertainment tax to the extent of 90 per cent in r







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top