SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Guj) 180

A.P.RAVANI
J. K. DAVE – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.R.NANAVATI, N.J.MEHTA

A. P. RAVANI, J.

( 1 ) SHOULD the Court interfere in matters of transfer of a Government servant or of an employee engaged by any other instrumentality of the `state as defined in Art. 12 of the Constitution of India ? In view of the decision of the Supreme Court and that of the Division Bench of this High Court does the question not require re-thinking and fresh approach ? It is not time for us to turn the search-light to our ownselves and make a little introspection ? The aforesaid questions need to be examined and answered in this petition wherein a lecturer of a college has challenged the legality and validity of the order of his transfer.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is serving as lecturer in sociology At Government Arts and Science College Gandhinagar. He is ordered to be transferred to Dharmandrasinhji Arts College Rajkot. The petitioner challenges the legality and validity of the order of transfer. It is contended that there are three to four other lecturers who are in Ahmedabad and/or Gandhinagar colleges for a period of about 15 to 18 years. They have not been transferred while the petitioner who has put in lesser number of years of service at Gandhinagar has been ordered to be tr










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top