SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Guj) 192

S.B.MAJMUDAR
SAURASHTRA CEMENT and CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
ESMA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: ANIL DIWAN, JETHAMALANI RAM

S. B. MAJMUDAR, J.

( 1 ) IN this Company Application the applicants have sought dismissal of the main Company Petition No. 62 of 1986 in view of certain preliminary objections about maintainability of the petition as they seek to raise by way of this application.

( 2 ) IN order to appreciate the nature of the controversy posed for my consideration in this application it is necessary to note a few introductory facts. Respondent Esma Industries Private Limited has filed main Company Petition No. 62 of 1986 in this Court. The said petition is filed under Secs. 391 and 398 of the Companies Act 1956 (the Act for short ). It seeks to challenge certain alleged acts of omission/commissions said to have been committed by original respondents Nos. 2 and 3 of the company petition who are in charge of the management of the Company. It is alleged that they are conducting the affairs of the Company in a manner oppressive to its shareholders and also in the manner prejudicial to the interest of the Company. At admission stage this petition was opposed vehemently by the present applicants. Ultimately after healing both the parties this Court (G. T. Nanavati J.) was pleased to admit the company peti





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top