SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Guj) 207

G.T.NANAVATI, R.A.MEHTA
K. N. THANAKI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: M.A.BUKHARI, V.H.BHAIRAVIA

G. T. NANAVATI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners in all these petitions are work charged employees. The question which they have raised in these petitions is with respect to the status and right to be absorbed on completion of five years service.

( 2 ) IT is the grievance of the petitioners that even though they had completed five years service as workcharged employees they are not treated as temporary Government servants and are not given all the benefits on that basis. It is submitted that continuing the employees on workcharged establishment eventhough they had completed more than five years service is illegal and in violation of Art. 14 of the Constitution. It is also the contention of the petitioners that they are entitled to the status of temporary or permanent Govt. servants in view of the Resolution No. PAS/5575/ (45)/c dated 8-1-1976.

( 3 ) IN response to the rule issued by this Court the respondents have filed their reply affidavits and therein they have pointed out that the Government is giving benefit to these employees on workcharge establishments as per the said Government Resolution. It is further pointed out that as per the said Resolution and the policy of the Government th





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top