SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Guj) 11

P.R.GOKULAKRISHNAN, R.J.SHAH
KASHIBEN WD/o. PITAMBER DEVCHAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.M.CHHAYA, R.N.SHAH

P. R. GOKULAKRISHNAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS Special Civil Application is for issuing a writ direction or order for quashing and setting aside the sanctioned plan wherein the Surat Urban Development Authority had shown final Plot No. 109 of the petitioners for reservation of the cottage industry by the Surat Municipal Corporation. There is a further prayer for restraining the respondents in any way from implementing the said plan. Further consequential prayers have also been made in this Special Civil Application. Rule was issued. Mr. G. N. Desai the learned Counsel appears for the and respondent and waives service of Rule. Mr. Chhaya appears for the 1st respondent and waives service of Rule. As far as the 3rd respondent is concerned we feel that this petition can be disposed of in his absence on the facts and circumstances of this case. Since the learned Counsels appearing for the petitioners and the 1st and 2nd respondents are agreeable to dispose of the matter finally we have taken up this petition for final disposal. Hence we have heard the respective learned Counsels for the petitioners and 1st and 2nd respondents.

( 2 ) THE short facts of this case for the purpose of disposal of this S











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top