SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Guj) 5

D.C.GHEEWALA, J.P.DESAI
GAGUBHAI @ RAMAIYA MURA – Appellant
Versus
GOSWAMI BHIKAU GANGARAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: AJAY MEHTA, D.G.KARIA

J. P. DESAI, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals arise out of the common judgment delivered by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Kutch at Bhuj in M. A. C. P. No. 276 of 1983 and M. A. C. P. No. 272 of 1983 whereby awards for Rs. 1 lac and Rs. 61 720 have been passed respectively in the two aforesaid applications. These two appeals are being disposed of by this common judgment as they arise out of the common judgment delivered by the learned Tribunal.

( 2 ) IN M. A. C. P. No. 276 of 1983 the amount claimed was Rs. 1 lac while in M. A. C. P. No. 272 of 1983 the amount claimed was Rs. 75 0 It may be mentioned here that two other applications were also filed arising out of the same incident in which the claim did not exceed Rs 25 0 These four applications were heard together and disposed of by a common judgment. It may be mentioned here that the procedure laid down by Order XIX of the Civil Procedure Code was followed by the Tribunal in disposing of all these applications. The claim in the two petitions exceeded Rs. 25 0 and therefore the grievance made by the appellants is that the learned Tribunal committed an error in following the procedure of deciding the applications on affidavits.

( 3 )











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top