Gujarat High Court
Judgename :B.S.KAPADIA, M.B.SHAH
Aslambhai Ibrahimbhai Memon - Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat - Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL 844 of .
Decided On : 10/05/1989
The Investigating Officer is Shri D himself, who has seized the article and arrested the accused. He is the Officer empowered to investigate under Sec. 53 of the Act. When that is so, sub-sec. (4) thereof would not be applicable inasmuch as it would apply only in those cases in which the person, other that the person who is empowered to investigate, has seized the article or arrested the person and has forwarded to the person who is in charge of the Police Officer empowered under Sec. 53.
( 1 ) THE present appeal is directed against the order of conviction under Section 20 (b) (2) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act and the sentence to each of the two accused in R. I. for 10 years and fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- and in default to pay fine, further R. I. for six months passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Surat on september 21, 1988 in Sessions Case No. 92 of 1988.
( 2 ) THE facts of the case in short, are as under : 2. 1. On February 23, 1988 when Police Inspector Shri V. N. Desai was in his D. C. B. Office, he received secret information to the effect that one Aslam Ibrahim residing at Chowk Bazar, Madariwad was doing business of Charas and that, on that day, in the evening, a big quantity was to be received. At that time, Deputy Commissioner of Police Shri Cehiot and Police Sub-Inspector Shri Vyas, Shri Sevale and Shri Valvi were also present. Accordingly, two panchas were called and they were also made to understand about the raid, and they went in rickshaw to Chowk Bazar and were separately keeping watch. At about 23. 15 hours both the present appellants came from Saiyadpura four roads and they were coming towards Madariwad through the main road. At that time, they were accosted and, on enquiry, accused No. 1 disclosed his name as Aslam Ibrahim. He had with him a plastic bag of blue colour wherein there was one steel container, in which five packets wrapped in newspaper were found. On examining the packets, it was found that, in four packets, there were four lumps of charas and in the fifth packet, there were four lumps of small and big size. On smelling it, it was found to be charas. On searching person of Aslam Rs. 100/- were found. Immediately, thereafter the other accused - Ibrahim Mustafa was also searched, and from his pants pocket, 18 plastic packets containing pieces of charas were, found and an amount of Rs. 79. 50 was also found. All the said pieces were brought out and on smelling, it was found to be charas. 2. 2. Thereafter, the house of Aslam was searched and from there, a small tin box containing a small plastic box was found. In the said plastic box there were seven weights, viz. one of 50 grams, three of 20 grams, one of 10 grams and one of 5 grams and a small scale was also found along with a stapler and three boxes of pin. 2. 3. The aforesaid four lumps were weighed and each of them found to be of 240 grams, and the other four lumps were also weighed and the same found to be of 440 grams. Similarly, the quantity of charas recovered from Ibrahim Mustafa was also weighed and it was found to be of 30 grams. Sample was collected from each lump of charas recovered from Aslam and it was about 50 grams. Similarly, the quantity of charas i. e. 18 pieces recovered from Ibrahim Mustafa was also packed separately. The said samples were then packed and the signature of the Panch along with the wax seal of Police Inspector, D. C. B. was applied and after making the panchnama, the said muddamal was seized and, thereafter, the Chemical Analysis report was also filed. Thereafter, the crime was registered against the accused and, after completing the investigation, the charge-sheet was filed and the accused were tried for the said offence. The learned Judge, after carefully scrutinising the evidence of the prosecution witnesses, has passed the aforesaid order of conviction and sentence.
( 3 ) IN this case, after receiving the record, Mr. E. E. Saiyad, learned Advocate for the appellants, argued before us at length by making profuse use of evidence on record and raised various points. 3. 1. The first point that Mr. Saiyad has raised is that the seal of D. C. B. which was affixed on the forwarding letter to the Forensic Science Laboratory is not legible. We have perused the same today. Since it is handled in the trial Court by number of hands, the seal is in the broken condition. However, the question is whether at the time when the samples of muddamal were sent to the Chemica
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.