SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Guj) 167

A.P.RAVANI, J.U.MEHTA
NATWAR TEXTILE PROCESSORS PVT. LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.D.AJMERA, NILESH PANDYA, SUDHIR NANAVATI

A. P. RAVANI, J. U. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) THE petition has its roots in a show cause notice dated 28/12/1983 alleging that the petitioners have illicitly removed powerloom cotton fabrics (worth about rupees sixty two crores) without payment of Excise Duty. Petitioners lost upto Supreme Court in first round. In second round the petitioners retreated and withdrew the petition unconditionally without permission of the Court to file fresh petition. This is third round initiated in May 1986 Petition has remained at the threshold and the proceedings pursuant to show cause notice have also got stuck up on account of ad interim order passed by this Court. Is the petition maintainable ? While examining and answering the question let us also try to understand as to why and how the matter has remained st the admission stage till today.

( 2 ) THE petitioner No. 1 is a Private Limited Company carrying on the business of Cotton Textile and more particularly textile fabrics manufactured in power loom sector. Petitioner No. 2 is a share-holder and Director of petitioner No. 1 Company. Sometime in the month of October 1983 the petitioners factory premises were searched and pursuant thereto a show cause no

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top