SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Guj) 178

V.H.BHAIRAVIA, S.B.MAJMUDAR
HIREN RATILAL JARIWALA – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE SURAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: DIPAK K.TRIVEDI, MAHENDRA C.KAPADIA, NILESH PANDYA

S. B. MAJMUDAR, V. H. BHAIRAVIA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner who is detained under the provi- sions of the Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act 1985 (the Act for short) has brought in challenge the detention order dated 25-7-1989 passed by the Commissioner of Police Surat

( 2 ) THE submission of the learned Advocate for the petitioner is that while considering the question of less drastic remedy by way of externment of the petitioner under Sec 56 of the Bombay Police Act one vital fact has not been considered by the detaining authority presumably because it was not placed before him by the sponsoring authority and that fact is that even in past his own office had initiated externment proceedings against the petitioner for has alleged bootlegging activities and other nefarious activities on 15-10-1987. That these proceedings had culminated into order of externment which ultimately was set aside in appeal by the State Government on 25-4-1988. That from 15-10-1987 to 25-4-1988 not a single prohibition case is registered against the petitioner. This showed that pendency of externment proceedings had corrective or fear effect of the petitioner and he had suspended his alleged bootlegging




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top