K.J.VAIDYA
VAGHARI JENABHAI ATABHAI – Appellant
Versus
VAGHARI JESANGBHAI ugrabhai – Respondent
( 1 ) (I) What is the correct import of the phrase "relase him after due admonition appearing in Sec. 3 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 as well as consequential aspect thereto; viz. (ii) in what manner the said empowering provision pertaining to "admonition" is to be exercised and executed by the concerned Court and or to put it other way whether a mere recital in the judgment, to quote, "all the accused are hereby released after due admonition under Sec. 3 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958" (without there being any material on the record to indicate that an act of administering admonition to the accused was actually performed by the Court) by itself can be said to be a truly sufficient compliance with relevant provisions of the said Act ? are the questions which arises for consideration in this Criminal Revision Application.
( 2 ) THE facts insofar as they are relevant for this Revision, are that one vaghari Jenabhai Atabhai lodged a complaint before the Kalol Police Station alleging that on 5/06/1979, at about 7-00 p. m. when he was sitting outside his house, the respondent-accused viz. Vaghari Jesangbhai Ugrabhai and three others came abusing, entered his
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.