SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Guj) 38

P.R.GOKULAKRISHNAN, N.B.PATEL
JASHUBHAI HIRALAL GANDHI – Appellant
Versus
COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND DEPUTY COLLECTOR,ahmedabad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: H.B.ANTANI, H.J.TRIVEDI, R.M.VIN

N. B. PATEL, P. R. GOKULAKRISHNAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a typical case where legality and validity of the orders passed by the authorities under the Land Ceiling Act declaring the plots of the lands in excess are challenged by various proceedings in order to scuttle the acquisition of excess lauds for public purposes.

( 2 ) BOTH these Letters Patent Appeals arise out of a common order passed in Special Civil Application No. 6068 of 1988 and Special Civil Application No. 6069 of 1988. In both these Letters Patent Appeals Mr. Vin appears for the appellants Mr. Antani appears for respondents Nos. 1 and 2 and Mr. Pujara appears for respondents Nos. 3 4 and 5. The learned Counsels appearing for the respondents got notice and say that the matters be heard and decided finally. Mr. Vin is agreeable in taking up these appeals for final hearing today and therefore the arguments were heard.

( 3 ) LETTERS Patent Appeal No. 111 of 1989 is filed by the alleged irrevocable power of attorney-holder of the original land-holders i. e. respondents Nos. 3 to 5 in Letters Patent Appeal No. 111 of 1989. Letters Patent Appeal No. 112 of 1989 is filed by the purchasers of the land as late as in 23/04/1986

( 4 )













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top