SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Guj) 88

P.R.GOKULAKRISHNAN, C.V.JANI
KANDARPKUMAR KRISHNAKUMAR DHOLAKIA – Appellant
Versus
GUJARAT PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.F.SHAH, Sandip C.Shah

C. V. JANI, P. R. GOKULAKRISHNAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS Letters Patent Appeal is against the order passed by the learned single Judge in Special Civil Application No. 5688 of 1985 (Reported in 1990 02) GLR 1058 ). The appellants herein came forward with the Special Civil Application for issue of a writ of mandamus and/or any other writ order or direction quashing and setting aside the results of the appellants at the elimination test held on 30-9-1984 by the Public Service Commission for the purpose of Recruitment to posts of Civil Judges (Junior Division) and Judicial Magistrates (First Class) in the Gujarat Judicial Services Class II (Junior Branch) and the appellants have also prayed for a direction to the effect that the appellants be called for interviews to be held for appointment to the said posts.

( 2 ) IT is unnecessary for us to refer to the other prayers made in the Special Civil Application since they are not relevant for the disposal of the Letters Patent Appeal. The learned single Judge of our High Court after property appreciating the examination held by the Pubic Service Commission for eliminating the candidates who have failed in the examination upheld the method adopted by












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top