SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Guj) 126

J.N.BHATT
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
MER PARBAT RAMAJI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.N.TRIVEDI, M.N.POPAT

BHATT, J.

( 1 ) BY this revision, petitioner-State has challenged the judgment and order dated 22-4-1985 passed by the learned Assistant Judge, at Jamnagar, in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 113 of 1984. Thus, the State has invoked the provisions of Sec. 115 of this Code of Civil Procedure ("code" for short hereinafter ). * against the order passed by the Assistant Judge, Jamnagar in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 113 of 1984 whereby the Judge confirmed the order passed by the trial Court in R. C. S. No. 914 of 1983.

( 2 ) LEARNED Assistant Government Pleader Shri D. N. Trivedi appeared for the petitioner-State. Learned Advocate Shri. M. N. Popat for learned Advocate mrs. M. C. Thakkar, appeared for the respondent.

( 3 ) THE impugned order is challenged on diverse grounds. However, one of the contentions, pertaining to the competence and jurisdiction of the Court, being important and going to the root of the matter, is examined and considered first. Mr. Trivedi, learned A. G. P. for the State, seriously contended that Civil Court has no jurisdiction and, therefore, the passing of interim order by the trial Court and then confirming by the appellate Court would be totally invalid and illegal. Thus,








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top