SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Guj) 137

B.S.KAPADIA
BHANIBEN MAKANBHAI TANDEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: RAVI R.TRIPATHI, S.N.SHELAT

B. S. KAPADIA, J.

( 1 ) THE present application is filed under Article. 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the orders passed by the A. L. T. and Mamlatdar Valsad in Tenancy Case No. 84/c No. 1347 By the said order the land purchased by the petitioners by the registered document dated 12 for which the mutation entries were made in the name being Entry No. 936 in the year 1969 certified on 1 3/06/1969 were held to be illegal particularly on the ground that the petitioners were not the agriculturists in respect of the land in the State of Gujarat and therefore the transaction was hit under Section 63 of the Tenancy Act. By the said order they were ordered to hand over the possession back to the original vendor within 3 months failing which the sale was to be declared invalid and would vest in the State Government. The said order was passed on 29 of March 1986. Being aggrieved by the same the present petitioner filed Tenancy Appeal No. 66 before the Deputy Collector Valsad. The said appeal was dismissed by the order dated S-6-1978. Being aggrieved by the said order petitioner preferred Revision Application u/s. 76 of the Tenancy Act before G. R. T. Gujarat Revenue Tribunal by







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top