SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Guj) 144

V.H.BHAIRAVIA
SHANKERBHAI MATHURBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
RAMANLAL VRAJLAL PATEL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.H.Mehta, C.S.GHOSH, M.A.BUKHARI, R.K.SHAH

BHAIRAVIA, J.

( 1 ) THIS Revision Application is preferred by the petitioneroriginal accused against the order passed by the learned J. M. F. C. , Borsad dated 2-5-1983 on application Exh. 16 and 18 in Cri. Case No. 1985 of 1982. A complaint was filed by the respondent against the present petitioner for an offence punishable under Secs. 78 and 79 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Borsad. On receiving this complaint, the learned Magistrate ordered to send this complaint for enquiry under Sec. 202 and sought the report from the police. The offence is alleged to have been committed by the petitioner under Secs. 78 and 79 of the Trade and Merchandise marks Act, 1958 alleging that the petitioner had used a new trade mark "jaswant chhap Special Telephone Bidi", which trade mark belonged to the complainant alone and it is registered under the Trade Mark Registry in the name of the complainant. The petitioner is also dealing in bidi business and he being the rival in the bidi business, the filing of this complaint was necessitated. The petitioner-accused submitted an application to the learned Magistrate Exh. 16 contending that the Court has n








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top