SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Guj) 168

J.U.MEHTA, S.M.SONI
ADAM HASAN RAJANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.B.NAIK, KIRAN JANI, R.R.Tripathi

MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner who is the detenu has challenged the order of detention dated 18-2-1989 passed by the Addl. Chief Secretary to Government, home Department, Gandhinagar, who is respondent No. 2 herein, by exercising the powers under sub-sec. (1) of Sec. 3 of the Conservation of Foreign exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA act) and directed that the detenu be kept in custody in the Central Prison, ahmedabad. Along with the order of detention, the grounds of detention and the materials relied upon were served to the detenu at the time of the execution of the order. On 9-3-1989 a declaration under Sec. 9 of the Act was also issued by Shri B. V. Kumar, Additional Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, who is respondent no. 4 herein. Both the order are challenged in this petition.

( 2 ) THE allegations made in the grounds of detention reveal that on 11- 1-1989 the detenu along with others was apprehended when the smuggled gold was being transport in the truck bearing No. GBC 7280. Thus, the present detenu with others was apprehended and the gold was seized under a reasonable belief that the gold was s






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top