J.N.BHATT
MANGUBHAI MANSUKHRAM PANDYA – Appellant
Versus
PRANJIVAN TRIBHOVANDAS PUROHIT – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Civil Judge (S. D. ). at Baroda in Special Civil Suit No. 312 of 1972 on 30-12-1975. Thus the plaintiffs have invoked the aids of the provisions of Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code (`code for short hereinafter) and have now come up before this Court by way of this appeal.
( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to the present appeal may be shortly stated at the out set.
( 3 ) THE present appellants are the original plaintiffs who instituted the above suit for re- covery of Rs. 13 810 from the present respondent/original defendant on the basis of nine pro- notes.
( 4 ) THE appellants who are the original plaintiffs inter alia contended by filing the above suit that they had advanced a sum of Rs. 13 810 to the respondent who is the original de- fendant for his contract work on different dates on the basis of pro-nots. The original defendant had executed nine pro-notes as follows: @@@ -- sr. No. Date Amount -- 1 11 1 0 2 23 200 3 27 400 4 30 1 0 5 5 4 200 6 9 1 655 7 17 1 770 8 26 2 40 9 31 1 545 13 810 -
( 5 ) THE plaintiffs demanded the said
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.