SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Guj) 196

R.D.VYAS, B.S.KAPADIA
GUJARAT WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD – Appellant
Versus
SUNDARDAS HUKUMATRAM SHIVANANI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.H.BAGCHI, M.N.BHAVNANI, P.F.MAKVANA

KAPADIA, J.

( 1 ) ). The aforesaid appeals have been filed by the State of Gujarat against the common judgment and decrees passed in the Civil Suits Nos. 3001, 3010 and 3011 of 1972 passed by the learned Judge of the City Civil Court, court No. 2. Ahmedabad, on 1-4-1978.

( 2 ) ). In Civil Suit No. 3001 of 1972 decree was passed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant for a sum of Rs. 30,617. 00 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum on that amount from the date of the suit till the date of the decree and at the same rate and on the same amount from the date of decree till realisation. The defendant was ordered to bear its own costs and would bear the costs of the plaintiff to the extent the plaintiff has succeeded. The plaintiff was ordered to bear his costs to the extent he has failed.

( 3 ) ). In Civil Suit No. 3010 of 1972 decree is passed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant for a sum of Rs. 27,744. 00 with six percent interest on that amount from the date of the suit till the date of decree and at the same rate and on the same amount from the date of decree till realisation. The defendant was ordered to bear its own costs and to bear the costs of























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top