SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Guj) 209

J.N.BHATT
KOLI MANSUKH RANA – Appellant
Versus
PATEL NATHA RAMJI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: AKSHAY H.MEHTA, M.J.BUDDHBHATTI

BHATT, J.

( 1 ) THE present appeal is directed against the judgment and award passed by the learned Judge, Labour Court and Ex-officio Commissioner for Workmens Compensation, Rajkot, (commissioner for short, hereinafter) in W. C. (N. F.) Application No. 14 of 1981, by invoking the aids of the provisions of Sec. 30 of the Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 (act for short, hereinafter ). The appellant is the original applicant/ workman and the respondent herein is the original opponent/employer. Therefore, they are hereinafter referred to as workman and employer" for the sake of convenience and brevity.

( 2 ) THE workman claimed compensation of Rs. 16,128. 00 for personal accidental injuries sustained by him when he was attending sugar-cane crushing machine, on 10-2-1981. The workman was earning monthly wages of Rs. 330. 00. On the day of the accident, his right hand was crushed in the said crushing machine, which resulted into the permanent partial disablement to the extent of 60%. The workman contended that he was working with the opponent/employer and he sustained injuries in the course of and out of his employment with the opponent/employer. Despite notice being served, the employer
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top