SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Guj) 213

V.H.BHAIRAVIA
DHIRAJLAL GANDABHAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: H.M.CHINOY, M.A.BUKHARI

BHAIRAVIA, J.

( 1 ) THIS Cri. Rev. Application has been filed by the petitionersaccused against the judgment and order dated 24-8-1983 passed by the learned extra Addl. Sessions Judge, Surat in Cri. Appeal No. 145 of 1982. The petitioneraccused have been prosecuted for the offences punishable under Secs. 65 (e), 66 (b) read with Sec. 82 of the Bombay Prohibition Act in the Court of the learned judicial Magistrate (F. C.) Vyara in Criminal Case No. 287 of 1982. The learned magistrate, after appreciating the evidence led by the prosecution, by his judgment and order dated 5-12-1982, convicted the petitioners-accused for the offence punishable under Secs. 66 (b), 65 (e) and 81 of the Bombay Prohibition Act and sentenced them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 3 months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500. 00 in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for 1 month each for the offence punishable under Sec. 66 (b), of the Bombay Prohibition Act, and to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 6 months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500. 00, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for 2 months each for the offence punishable under sec. 65 (e) of the







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top