SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Guj) 74

C.K.THAKKER
GUJARAT NYLONS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
GUJARAT STATE FERTILIZERS COMPANY LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.H.CHHATRAPATI, K.N.RAVAL, KALPESH ZAVERI, P.M.RAVAL

C. K. THAKKAR, J.

( 1 ) BOTH these Company Petitions are filed under Section 391 read with Section 394 of the Companies Act 1956 for obtaining sanction of the Court to a Scheme of Amalgamation of Gujarat Nylons Ltd. Surat (hereinafter referred to as GNL) with Gujarat State Fertilizers Company Limited Baroda (hereinafter referred to as GSFC and for other consequential directions.

( 2 ) APPLYING well established principles of law discussed hereinabove and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case the Company petitions are required to be allowed by the petitioners. However an objection is raised on behalf of the Gujarat Nylons Employees Union (Union of the Transferor Company) Affidavit-in-reply is filed by Shri H. B. Vasia Secretary of the Union of the Transferor Company opposing the amalgamation of the Transferer Company with the Transferee Company and in particular objection was raised against clause 12 of the Amalgamation Scheme which reads as under: (13) On the scheme being effective all employees of the transferer Company shall be deemed to have become employees of the transferee Company with effect from appointed date without breaking their services and they sha
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top