A.P.RAVANI, R.D.VYAS
HARESH KANTILAL VORA – Appellant
Versus
COMPETENT AUTHORITY and ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, RAJKOT – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner was one of the partners of the firm named Madhusudan Oil Mill Rajkot. The firm had purchased a piece of land admeasuring 2465. 10 sq. mtrs. by sale deed dated 27/10/1970 The land is situated within the limits of Urban Agglomeration Area of Rajkot town. On coming into force of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act 1976 (the Act for short) the firm filled in the form under Section 6 (1) of the Act. Before the competent authority it was contended that the partnership document dated 16/04/1971 was executed and as per this partnership deed individual partners were the co-owners of the land in question. Therefore individual holding of different partners was required to be taken into consideration and on this basis no one held the land in excess of the ceiling limit. The competent authority accepted the submission and ordered to file the form as per his order dated 10/10/1980
( 2 ) THE Government in exercise of its power under Section 34 of the Act issued show-cause notice dated 13/02/1984 and called upon the firm to show cause as to why the case should not be taken in revision. It was alleged that the firm was a person as defined under the Act. Therefo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.