SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Guj) 252

K.J.VAIDYA, SHARAD D.DAVE
AJITKUMAR SOMNATH PANDYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.P.Raval, NITIN AMIN

VAIDYA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 29-8-1984, rendered in Special Case No. 5 of 1984, by the learned Special judge, Ahmedabad, wherein the appellant Ajitkumar Somnath Pandya, who came to be tried for the alleged offences punishable under Secs. 5 (l) (d), 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (for short the Act) and sec. 161 of the I. P. C. , at the end of the trial, was ordered to be convicted for the same and sentenced to R. I. for one year and, to pay fine of Rs. 1,000. 00 and in default, R. I. for one month.

( 2 ) THE prosecution version as reflected in the evidence of the complainant premjibhai Lakhabhai Vaghela (PW-1, Ex. 7) to be briefly stated, is to the effect that he was serving as a labourer in Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation, road-II Engineering Division, under the supervision of the appellant. According to the complainant, on every month the appellant was demanding and accepting rs. 10/- from each and every labourer as illegal gratification and was unduly harassing those who did not obey to the said demand. Further according to the complainant, since he also had committed defaults in paying the said instalment of the bribe a















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top