B.J.SHETHNA
GUJARAT SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
RAJKOT ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION – Respondent
( 1 ) RULE Mr. Nanavati L. A. for the respondent waives service of Rule. By consent of the parties this application is ordered to be heard today.
( 2 ) ON 19-8-91 the respondent-plaintiff filed a Civil Suit No. 732/91 in the court of the learned Civil Judge (SD) Rajkot and prayed for ex parte injunction by filing application Exh. 5 in the said suit. The learned Judge after hearing the learned Advocate of the plaintiff did not grant ex parte interim injunction as prayed for; but ordered to issue short notice and make it returnable on 22-9-91 to the defendant corporation-present petitioner. The order of the said notice was received by the petitioners branch office at Rajkot on 21-8-91.
( 3 ) AS no ex parte injunction was granted by the learned Civil Judge the respondent herein rushed before the learned Assistant Judge Rajkot by way of an appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 of C. P. C. Admittedly it was an order issuing notice only therefore no Appeal from Order would lie against that order under Order 43 Rule 1 C. P. C. Still the learned Assistant Judge on 20- 8-91 issued ex parte injunction as prayed for by the present respondent-plaintiff though the learned Civil Judge ma
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.