SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Guj) 290

C.K.THAKKER, R.C.MANKAD
N. D. BUCH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: S.N.SHELAT, S.R.DIVETIA

R. C. MANKAD, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER who was a member of the Indian Administrative Service (IAS for short) was holding the post of Additional Chief Secretary to the Government of Gujarat Home Department when he was due to superannuate from service with effect from 17/11/1972 He was however granted six months extension in service and retired with effect from 17/05/1973 He was reemployed as Commissioner for Tourism from 18/05/1973 and worked as such upto 2/01/1974 Thereafter he was re-employed as Member-Secretary of the Administrative Reforms Committee from 24/01/197 4/07/1975 While the petitioner was employed as Member-Secretary of the Administrative Reforms Committee he also held charge of the post of Vigilance Commissioner. From 28/07/1975 the petitioner was re-employed as full-time Vigilance Commissioner which post he held till 10/09/1980 It is the case of the petitioner that during the period of his re-employment his pay was determined in accordance with the formula of last pay drawn minus pension including pension equivalent of Death-Cum-Retirement Gratutity (DCRG for short) which was determined at Rs. 239 per month. In the different posts in which the petitioner was re-employed af



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top