SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Guj) 275

B.J.SHETHNA
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
DIWALIBEN RADHAV KHANT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.C.SHAH

SHETHNA, J.

( 1 ) ALL these Civil Revision Applications are disposed of by this common judgment as the question involved in all these Revision applications is the same. State of Gujarat has preferred these Revision applications against the impugned common order dt. 2-8-1989 passed by the learned Extra Assistant Judge, Rajkot District at Gondal passed below exh. 1 in Civil Misc. Applns. Nos. 104 of 1988 to 108 of 1988, 21 of 1989 to 33 of 1989, 35 of 1985, 52 of 1989 to 55 of 1989. The learned Extra Asstt. Judge allowed all applications and modified the earlier judgment passed by his predecessor in his office in Review Application to the effect that the respondent claimants in each applications be awarded additional amount at the rate of 12% of the market value of the land per annum for the entire period beginning from the issuance of preliminary notification upto the award of the Collector or the taking of the possession of the land whichever is earlier.

( 2 ) MR. K. C. Shah, learned A. G. P. appearing for the State has contended before me that once the review applications have been granted earlier by the learned Extra Assistant Judge by his impugned common order dated 15-3-1988, th








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top