SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Guj) 17

S.D.SHAH, G.T.NANAVATI
ASHAPURA MINERAL COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.H.JOSHI, J.M.THAKAR, KAMAL MEHTA, M.G.DOSHIT

G. T. NANAVATI, S. D. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) ). In these petitions, the petitioners, who are assesses under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the act) are challenging the constitutional validity of S. 47 (4a) of the act. In special Civil Application no. 5283/88 the validity of S. 45 (5) is also questioned.

( 2 ) ). The petitioners are all registered dealers under the act. They did not pay the tax due within the prescribed time and / or within the time specified in the notices issued under section 47 (4) of the act. As a result thereof they are called upon to pay interest on the amounts of tax not so paid or on any less amount thereof remaining unpaid. That was challenged by some petitioners by way of appeals, but the same were dismissed. The petitioner question the validity of S. 47 (4a) which provides for payment of interest on amount of tax not paid at the rate of 24% per annum and also the assessment orders or orders passed in appeals in so far as they relate to levy of interest. According to the petitioners, the said provision is ultra vires the legislative powers of the state legislature and also Art. 14, 19 (1) (8) and 300a of the constitution. Section 45 (5)




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top