SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Guj) 50

B.C.PATEL
JITUBHAI SHANABHAI BHATT – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.B.ANANDJIVALA, S.R.DIVETIA

B. C. PATEL, J.

( 1 ) MR. Anandjiwala, learned Counsel has preferred this bail application. He has relied upon First Information Report (Annexure "a") and the order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge in bail application No. 86 of 1992 for enlarging the petitioner on bail (Annexure "b" ). After perusing the said documents, as this Court was not inclined to admit the matter, the learned Counsel requested the Court to permit him to withdraw the application on the ground that if permission is not granted, he will not be in a position to file another bail application.

( 2 ) SECTION 156 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code) empowers the Police officer to investigate any cognizable case. Section 157 of the Code contemplates procedure for investigation. Sections 158, 159, 160 and 161 of the Code empower the Police officer to forward his report, hold investigation or preliminary inquiry and it also empowers him to call upon any person being acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case and to examine such persons. Section 162 of the Code contemplates recording and use of statements. Section 164 of the Code provides for recording of confess











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top