J.N.BHATT
HANSABEN RAMESHKUMAR PATANI – Appellant
Versus
RAMESHKUMAR RATILAL patani – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS revision application under Sec. 397 read with Sec. 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (code for short hereinafter), the petitioner-original applicant, wife, has questioned the legality and validity of the composits order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, at mehsana, on 30-10-1985, in Criminal Revision Application Nos. 163 of 1984 and 74 of 1985. The resume of the material fact giving rise to the present revision, may be, shortly stated at this stage so as to appreciate the merits of the present revision and challenge against it. The petitioner is the original applicant-wife, who initiated legal battle by filing a Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 42 of 1982 in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, at Patan, under Sec. 125 of the Code for her maintenance, against the respondent No. 1, Rameshkumar Ratilal Patani, who is the Original opponent-husband. They arc hereinafter referred to as "husband" and "wife" for the sake of convenience and brevity.
( 2 ) THE marriaee of spouses took place, on 29-5-1975, according to the hindu rites, at Patan. The wife thereafter went to her husbands house at Mount Abu, where her husband
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.