B.C.PATEL
JAYANTIBHAI LALUBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) RULE. Mr. Divetia, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor waives service of rule. At the request of learned Counsels, application is heard today. Petitioner has filed these applications as his application for obtaining certified copy of complaint was not entertained by Judicial Magistrate, First class, Patan. The facts relevant for deciding these applications are as under : one complaint has been registered by Patan Taluka Police Station as c. R. No. 34 of 1992 on 25-2-1992. Some allegations were made in the complaint against the petitioner and therefore petitioner wanted to approach this Court for obtaining orders under Sec. 438 of the Criminal Procedure code (hereinafter referred to as the code ). With a view to present his case before this Court, the petitioner applied for certified copy of First information Report (hereinafter referred to as F. I. R. for brevity) referred to above and also deposited Rs. 10. 00 on 5-3-1992. However, his application was rejected and order was passed to the effect that the amount be refunded and application may be filed. Being aggrieved by that order the petitioner has approached this Court.
( 2 ) MR. Nitin Amin, learned Advocate for the p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.