SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Guj) 113

N.B.PATEL, K.G.SHAH
PRAKASH CHEMICALS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNASINGH SATASINGH KAANIYARA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: R.R.MARSHAL, S.N.SHELAT

K. G. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) AT 1. 30 p. m. on 21/07/1982 an automobile collision occurred within the Indian Petrochemicals Limited (IPCL for short) campus near Baroda. In the collision two vehicles were involved. One was a scooter bearing registration No. BHC 1206 of the ownership of Respondent No. 1 Singh Sata Singh and the same at the time of collision was driven by that Respondent No. 1. The other vehicle was an ambassador car bearing registration No. GTH 5198 which belonged to the appellant herein and was being driven by the driver of the appellant. In that ambassador car certain persons were travelling. As a result of the accident Respondent No. 1 suffered some injuries. He sustained a fracture of the left femur bone and he also sustained some other injuries. Some of the passengers travelling in that ambassador car also sustained some injuries. The car was also damaged; so also was the scooter damaged.

( 2 ) BEFORE the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Vadodara five compensation cases under Section 110 A of the Motor Vehicles Act 1939 (for short the Act) came to be filed. Three of those claim petitions were filed by the passengers travelling in the motor car who claimed compensation i


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top