SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Guj) 110

C.K.THAKKER
CIBA GEIGY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.L.SHAH, G.N.DESAI, Y.J.TRIVEDI

THAKKER, J.

( 1 ) ). This appeal is filed against an order passed by the Second extra Assistant Judge, Baroda below application Exh. 5/04/1992 in Trade Mark Suit No. 1 of 1992. The appellants are the original plaintiffs and the respondent is the original defendant. The appellants -plaintiffs filed a suit in the District Court at Baroda being Trade Mark Suit No. 1 of 1992 for permanent injunction restraining the respondent-defendant from using in any manner in relation to pharmaceutical or medicinal preparations, the impugned trade mark CLOFRANIL or any other distinctly similar trade mark so as to infringe the trade mark registered in favour of the plaintiff No. 1 bearing No. 233145 under the style of ANAPRANIL. Alongwith the plaint, the plaintiffs filed an application Exh. 5 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for interim relief. The Assistant Judge, baroda by an order dt. 3/04/1992 issued notice to the defendant and granted ex-parte ad-interim relief in favour of the plaintiffs restraining the defendants from using the said trade mark till 24/04/1992.

( 2 ) ). Being aggrieved by the said order the defendant approached this Court by filing Appeal From O






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top