SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Guj) 123

K.J.VAIDYA
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
O. P. GOYAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.K.TRIVEDI

VAIDYA, J.

( 1 ) WHAT indeed the law alone can do to help redress the grievances of the aggrieved ones for whom it is ordinarily or specially meant for and made to deliver justice, when unfortunately, the same itself, sometimes stand by-passed, ignored and thereby victimised by no less authorities than the law enforcing agencies themselves, namely the Executives and the judiciary (c) (c)? For example, in the instant cases, the learned Magistrate himself, who because of his patent ignorance about the object of the Act and lack of social orientation and commitment to the cause and call-for social justice, acquitted the accused without any effective trial. . 1. 1. It is quite known that ordinarily law is enacted with a view to regulate and govern the relation between person and person, person and the group of persons, between group of persons inter-se as well as between all these groups of persons and the State, for the redressal of the grievances and for getting justice. Over and above this ordinary law, there are certain statutes which are enacted with some social object to protect and enhance the social justice of those needy sections of the society like the labourers or working cla

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top