SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Guj) 139

V.H.BHAIRAVIA, S.M.SONI
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
DALPATSING MAFASING – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.B.ANANDJIVALA, M.A.BUKHARI

V. H. BHAIRAVIA, J.

( 1 ) THE order passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate is, therefore, consistent with the provisions of law and no Court can go beyond that. It is an admitted fact that no such complaint has been filed by the Court or Police officer and the entire proceeding proceeded only on the private complaint. In our view, the trial Court has committed blunder in taking cognizance of the offence despite the clear-cut direction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate. Provisions of Sec. 195 of Cr. P. Code are mandatory and violation thereof would amount to exercise of powers rendering the entire proceedings ab-initio void, null and void. Same is the story in the instant case. [rest of the Judgment is not material for the Reports. ] (ATP) Prosecution quashed. (Only a part of the Judgment approved for reporting is published.)


.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top