SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Guj) 182

SHARAD D.DAVE, G.T.NANAVATI
NATHABHAI M. PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: ANANT S.DAVE, G.N.DESAI, H.S.MUNSHAW, U.R.BHATT

NANAVATI, J.

( 1 ) BY a notification dated 28/11/1991, issued by the Development Commissioner in exercise of the powers under Sec. 9 (2) of the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961, local area known as Ramnagar came to be separated from the local area comprising Bavala Nagar panchayat and it was further declared that after division, the local area comprising Bavala Nagar Panchayat shall be known as Bavala Nagar panchayat covering the area of Bavala Revenue village and Ramnagar Gram panchayat covering the area of Ramnagar New Vasahat. This notification was challenged by the President of Bavala Nagar Panchayat by filing a petition in this Court, being Special Civil Application No. 9001 of 1991. The learned single Judge who heard the said petition, rejected the same summarily on the ground that the decision to bifurcate Bavala nagar Panchayat cannot be said to be otherwise than in accordance with law and that it cannot be said that there was no consultation as required under the provisions of Sec. 9 of the Act. The President of Bavala Nagar panchayat has, therefore, filed this appeal.

( 2 ) THE learned Counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that with respect to the proposal to split up











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top