SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Guj) 229

K.J.VAIDYA, S.M.SONI
SHILPA BANSILAL SHAH – Appellant
Versus
BANSILAL K. SHAH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: BANSILAL K.SHAH, S.J.JOSHI

VAIDYA, J.

( 1 ) "whether a Court granting an ad interim or final award of maintenance to the discarded, disabled dependents, should rest itself, contended, thus far only and not further, merely stopping at the passing - of the said award, and thereafter necessarily wait for sometime to help them out to realize the amount so awarded till only, if, as and when they so approach it once again, following the second bout of the legal duel by way of execution of the impugned award either by taking-up further proceedings by way of executive and/or the Contempt proceedings ? Or "whether alternatively, following the call of humanistic approach and the speedy justice as promised under Art. 21 of the Constitution of India, the concerned Court should immediately volunteer and take upon itself the sacred duty to render easy and expeditious substantial justice by seeing that the amount awarded is immediately made available to the claimants in a manner which may not only ultimately save them from further undue harrassment of roaming about from pillar to the post, but before they ultimately getting exhausted and exasperated, start thinking and cursing that the remedy sought for was worst than their












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top