K.J.VAIDYA, S.M.SONI
SHILPA BANSILAL SHAH – Appellant
Versus
BANSILAL K. SHAH – Respondent
( 1 ) "whether a Court granting an ad interim or final award of maintenance to the discarded, disabled dependents, should rest itself, contended, thus far only and not further, merely stopping at the passing - of the said award, and thereafter necessarily wait for sometime to help them out to realize the amount so awarded till only, if, as and when they so approach it once again, following the second bout of the legal duel by way of execution of the impugned award either by taking-up further proceedings by way of executive and/or the Contempt proceedings ? Or "whether alternatively, following the call of humanistic approach and the speedy justice as promised under Art. 21 of the Constitution of India, the concerned Court should immediately volunteer and take upon itself the sacred duty to render easy and expeditious substantial justice by seeing that the amount awarded is immediately made available to the claimants in a manner which may not only ultimately save them from further undue harrassment of roaming about from pillar to the post, but before they ultimately getting exhausted and exasperated, start thinking and cursing that the remedy sought for was worst than their
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.