( 1 ) THIS Revision Application is filed by the petitioner, who is the original complainant, against the order passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge on 8-7-1992 releasing the respondents Nos. 2 to 4-original accused on bail. Original accused No. 1 is the father-in-law, original accused no. 2 is the mother-in-law and original accused No. 3 is the husband of the deceased.

( 2 ) BEFORE dealing with the contentions raised by Mr. Tripathi against the accused-respondent No. 4-husband of the deceased, preliminary objection raised by Mr. Nanavati, learned Advocate appearing for the respondents, is required to be dealt with. Mr. Nanavati submitted that this Revision application is filed by the private party against the order of grant of bail passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge and the same has not been challenged by the State by filing application before this Court for cancellation of that bail order. Therefore, this Court should not entertain this Revision application. It is true that the State has not challenged the order of bail passed by the learned trial Judge. But merely because the State has not challenged the same before this Court, it would not be a ground fo