SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Guj) 337

K.G.SHAH
AHMED HARUN GORI – Appellant
Versus
ABBAS IBRAHIM KARA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: C.L.SONI, J.R.Nanavati

SHAH, J.

( 1 ) ADMIT. Mr. J. R. Nanavati, learned Advocate for the respondents waives service. At the joint request of the learned Advocates for the parties, the matter is finally heard and disposed of.

( 2 ) THE appellant while, he was in the service of the respondents sustained employment injury. He therefore, made an application for claiming compensation in the sum of Rs. 29,400. 00, under the Workmens Compensation Act, before the learned Commissioner at Jamnagar. The claim petition was then returned to the claimant-appellant for being presented before the learned Commissioner at Baroda. Accordingly, the appellant presented the claim petition before the learned Commissioner at Baroda. Sometime in December, 1985, the commissioner under the Workmens Compensation Act, at Baroda, once again returned the claim petition for being presented before the Commissioner at jamnagar. Accordingly, the matter, was entertained by the Commissioner at jamnagar, who has ultimately, on the merits of the case passed an award in the sum of Rs. 5,880. 00, by way of compensation, and Rs. 2,9201- by way of penalty, and also awarded interest to the appellant at the rate of 6% per annum on the aforesaid two









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top