SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Guj) 309

B.S.KAPADIA, C.V.JANI
MANOHAR JAMATMAL SINDHI – Appellant
Versus
RANGUBA Wd/o. RAJPUJI PABAJI VIHOL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: C.M.PRAJAPATI, K.F.DALAL, P.V.NANAVATI, S.B.VAKIL, S.V.RAJU

KAPADIA, J.

( 1 ) THE present appeal is filed by the appellants who are the original opponents Nos. 1 and 3 in as much as the Motor Accident claims Tribunal-3 (Main) Ahmedabad held them liable to pay to the original petitioners a sum of Rs, 55,000-00 with interest thereon at the rate of 6 per cent per annum from 27/03/1980 till the payment and for depositing the said amount of award within eight weeks and that the petition against original opponent No. 4, namely. United India Assurance Co. who was the insurer of the vehicle involved in the accident was dismissed with no order as to costs. The aforesaid award and order is passed by the motor Accident Claims Tribunal on 31/03/1982 in Motor Accident claims Petition No. 154 of 1980.

( 2 ) SHORT facts of the appeal can be stated as under : the appellant No. 1 herein was the original opponent No. 1 and was the driver of the vehicle involved in accident while the appellant No. 2 herein and the original opponent No. 3 is the owner of the said vehicle bearing no. GRS 5811. Original opponent No. 4 who is respondent No. 7 herein was the insurer of the said motor vehicle. On 5/11/1979 when one rajoji the husband of the original petitioner No. 1



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top